Hello World Wide Web!
This is my first ever blog post, so I'm starting by posting something that I already had written for a college class. My classical mythology class required us to watch a movie, play, or television show based on mythology and then review (1) how accurately it portrayed the myth and (2) whether or not it was any good. As such, one
of my family’s favorite films to watch is O
Brother, Where Art Thou?
First of all, the general premise
for both The Odyssey and O Brother, Where Art Thou? is the same.
Not only is the general storyline remarkably similar, but also Homer is even
given credit as one of the writers for the film—I wonder if anyone thought to
ask him about that. The film even begins with the opening lines of The Odyssey: “O muse! / Sing in me, and
through me tell the story / Of that man skilled in all the ways of contending,
/ A wanderer, harried for years on end . . .” The main plot is the same in both.
Our hero, who has been imprisoned, breaks free and journeys home to his wife.
On the journey, many trials, hijinks, and detours occur that delay his return
back home. Certain events and characters harken back to Homer’s The Odyssey within the film, as well as
some small details that were thrown in here and there just to remind the viewer,
if watching close enough, that the epic poem was the basis of the story.
The main characters in both The Odyssey and O Brother, Where Art Thou? have the same name, cementing the
parallels between the two. Homer’s Odysseus is in fact reincarnated in Ulysses
Everett McGill, as “Ulysses” is simply the Latin form of “Odysseus.” In the film,
the main characters—
Ulysses Everett McGill (George Clooney), Pete (John
Turturro), and Delmar (Tim Blake Nelson)—only truly begin their journey by
hopping onto a railcar being moved by a blind black man. This man proceeds to
tell the trio some details of their future journey, including telling them that
the “treasure” they seek may not be the one they look for. This prophet figure
parallels with the soul of Teiresias, who Odysseus sought out to learn about the
trials during his journey home before they actually happened in order to avoid
them if possible. Both the film and the poem include sirens,
beautiful women—or
half-women—whose singing voices charm men and cause them to do things that they
normally would not do. In The Odyssey,
Odysseus and companions are able to pass by them without issue due to the
advice of Teiresias, but O Brother’s Everett,
Pete, and Delmar are not so lucky. Pete supposedly is transformed into a horny
toad, much to Delmar’s dismay. The idea of transformation of the hero’s
companions occurs in The Odyssey as
well through Circe’s transforming of Odysseus’s companions into swine.
Fortunately, the swine are eventually turned back into men. Unfortunately,
“Pete” the toad in O Brother is later
squished by the film’s Cyclops character
Big Dan Teague, a large one-eyed
monster that loves to eat meat. Homer’s Polyphemus kills the main character’s
companions in a different but slightly more gruesome way—he simply eats them.
While the journeys home in both The Odyssey and O Brother, Where Art Thou? include many parallels, the trials that
Odysseus and Everett face once returning home are extremely similar, with many
parallels happening within a small space of time. First, both main characters
return home to find that others are courting their wives and that their wives
are not exactly discouraging them. Of course, Penelope discourages her suitors
for as long as she can, while Penny—another strikingly similar name for the
reincarnation of a character—does all she can to keep her ex-husband away in
order to provide for her daughters with a more worthy suitor. Both main
characters have to use a disguise in order to sneak inside someplace to see
their wives. Odysseus sneaks inside his own house while Everett sneaks inside a
political rally. The disguise they both use is that of a beggar or homeless
wanderer.
The wife of both characters also sets an impossible task for the
husband to do to make sure he is home for good. In The Odyssey, Penelope brings out Odysseus’s bow and a line of
double axes, proclaiming that the suitor who can shoot the arrow through all of
the axe heads will be her husband. Only Odysseus, who is still in disguise, is
able to complete the challenge, leading to the happy reuniting of husband and
wife. In O Brother, Penny tells
Everett to retrieve their old wedding ring from their cabin, which she says is
in a roll-top desk. After a short series of unfortunate events, Everett returns
with the ring from the desk only to find it is the wrong ring. Penny then
declares that Everett has to find the real ring, which is at the bottom of a
very large lake at this point; a challenge that Everett proclaims is “one hell
of a heroic task.”
In addition to similar plot devices
in both the film and the poem, there are small details in the film that relate
back to the original myth. The personality of the main character is one such
detail. Both Odysseus and Everett are smooth-talking, intelligent men who can
find an answer for any question asked and a solution for any problem they come
across. Unfortunately, I believe that this comes at the price of their
morality. Both are on a journey back to see their wives, but neither of them
have anything against sleeping with other women on the way home. Odysseus, if I
am remembering correctly, manages to find the time to have some fun with nymphs
and princesses, while Everett intends to sleep with one of the sirens from the
river. After finding Pete missing, Everett acknowledges that having sex
probably would not have been a good thing, but, as Delmar says, he was “fixin’ to fornicate.” Another small
detail that could be easily overlooked in O
Brother, Where Art Thou? was the name of the candidate for governor, Homer
Stokes. I assume that this inclusion of the original plot’s author is similar
to how Stan Lee is incorporated into all of his superhero movies, but only a
name was used since Homer himself is no longer with us, having died over 2,000
years ago. Other details are more vague. Both The Odyssey and O Brother
include a water-related natural hazard. Odysseus has to navigate around the
whirlpool of Charybdis, and Everett has to swim through a flood brought about
by the building of a dam. Another reference is not even Greek, but it does
trace back to ancient Rome. When Everett learns that his daughters are using
his wife’s maiden name, he declares that he is
the pater familias, a Latin term used
in Roman society for basically the head of a household.
As described, there are many
parallels and similarities between Homer’s The
Odyssey and the film O Brother, Where
Art Thou? Even as I make these connections, though, I have to acknowledge
that the film was a modern remake and many of the plot details, such as the
setting and the time period, would be mythically incorrect. Originally, The Odyssey takes place in the
Mediterranean and the various islands found throughout the sea. Odysseus’s
journey takes ten years after the Trojan War around 12th century
BCE. O Brother puts the setting in a
more relatable, at least to American audiences, rural Mississippi with small
towns, cows, and all. The timing is during the Great Depression of the 1930s,
which contributes to why Penny is looking for a suitor that can support her and
her daughters and why George Nelson is traveling the countryside robbing banks.
Someone watching the film that has knowledge of The Odyssey also has to acknowledge that Homer’s epic poem is a myth. Yes, there are probably parts of the
poem based off real history—a war between Greece and Troy—but the majority of
the content is not historically accurate. In comparison, O Brother is more historical than mythical, using real historical
events—the Great Depression—to outline the characters’ motivations and costumes
to match the time period chosen for the setting.
Despite the details that link The Odyssey to O Brother, Where Art Thou? and the completely different settings
and time periods, I would recommend O
Brother, Where Art Thou? to almost anyone, which is something I have
certainly done in the past. The depression of the time period when it is set is
overlaid by the multitude of comedic events in the film. These events range
from small, such as the repeated “Damn, we’re in a tight spot!” near the
beginning when the trio is being smoked out of Pete’s cousin’s barn, to longer
and more involved, such as Everett’s frequent exclamations of “My hair!” and
obsession with “Dapper Dan” hair pomade that eventually leads to him being tracked
down using his hair treatment’s smell. The comedy also reaches from the dark,
such as the accidental coming-across of a Ku Klux Klan rally and subsequent
disguise as “colored” color guards, to more light-hearted, such as the “He’s a
suitor!” proclamation and the “Do you have a maiden name, Daddy?” question of
the Wharvey gals. O Brother also
appeals to me as an ex-choir member and life-long singer through its many
catchy songs. While the film cannot be considered a musical by any means, the
soundtrack is so enjoyable that my family owns a copy that we had bought almost
immediately after watching the film for the first time. Not only does a
song—“Man of Constant Sorrow”—contribute to Everett’s wife’s acceptance of him,
but singing is used to emphasize the mood in other scenes, specifically “Didn’t
Leave Nobody But the Baby” during the siren scene and “Lonesome Valley” during
the near-hanging scene at the end of the film. Both the comedy and the musical
numbers are major reasons that I believe that O Brother, Where Art Thou? is a great film to see even if the
audience knows nothing about Homer’s The
Odyssey.
On a side note, over fall break I actually heard "Man of Constant Sorrow" over the radio in a deli I ate lunch at during a trip. I busted out laughing (and singing of course!).
No comments:
Post a Comment